The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal abilities, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive dimension involves higher-order thinking processes that enable individuals to question their own cultural assumptions and adjust mental models during intercultural interactions. Cognitive CQ refers to knowledge of cultural norms, practices, and conventions across different societies. Motivational CQ captures the intrinsic drive and self-efficacy to engage with other cultures, while behavioral CQ reflects the flexibility to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions in cross-cultural encounters. Studies suggest that high CQ individuals are more likely to succeed in global assignments, negotiate effectively with international partners, and lead multicultural teams with greater cohesion. However, critics argue that the construct remains overly reliant on self-report measures, which may not accurately predict actual behavior in real-world intercultural situations.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 문화적 지능(CQ) 구성 개념의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A. 이는 문화 간 상황에서 감성 지능의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 이는 실제 행동을 반영하지 못할 수 있는 자기 평가 도구에 크게 의존한다.
C. C. 인지적 지식에만 초점을 맞추고 동기 요인을 간과한다.
D. D. 다문화 팀을 이끄는 데 효과적이지 않은 것으로 입증되었습니다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It relies heavily on self-assessment tools that may not reflect true behavior.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first