The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that these markers are stratigraphically distinct and globally synchronous, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that human activities have altered the environment for millennia, and that the proposed markers lack the long-term durability of natural geological boundaries. This debate underscores the tension between scientific classification and societal narratives about human responsibility for planetary change.
❓ 本文によると、一部の批評家が人新世を地質時代として正式に定めることに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A) 人間の環境への影響は非常に長い間続いており、新しいものではない。
B. B) 提案されたマーカーは、世界的に十分に広く分布しておらず、有用であるとは言えない。
C. C) この用語は、人間の活動よりも自然の気候変動に焦点を当てすぎている。
D. D) 科学者たちは、放射性降下物が唯一の信頼できる指標であることで一致している。
✅ 正确答案
A) Human impact on the environment has been occurring for a very long time and is not new.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first