The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. Unlike previous geological epochs, which were defined by natural phenomena such as ice ages or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers like nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that this new epoch began in the mid-20th century, coinciding with the 'Great Acceleration' of industrial growth and resource consumption. However, critics contend that formalizing the Anthropocene as a geological epoch oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and social strata. They suggest that a more nuanced framework, recognizing differential responsibility and vulnerability, is necessary for effective environmental policy. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific classification with socio-political realities.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식적으로 정의하는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 계속해서 지구를 형성하고 있는 자연 현상을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B. 이는 인간의 영향이 다양한 인구 집단에 걸쳐 고르지 않게 분포되어 있다는 점을 무시한다.
C. C. 그것은 핵 낙진과 플라스틱과 같은 지표에 너무 많은 중점을 둔다.
D. D. 그것은 그 시대가 20세기 중반에 너무 최근에 시작되었음을 시사한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It ignores the uneven distribution of human impacts across different populations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first