The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. Unlike previous geological epochs, which were defined by natural phenomena such as ice ages or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers like nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that this new epoch began in the mid-20th century, coinciding with the 'Great Acceleration' of industrial growth and resource consumption. However, critics contend that formalizing the Anthropocene as a geological epoch oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and social strata. They suggest that a more nuanced framework, recognizing differential responsibility and vulnerability, is necessary for effective environmental policy. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific classification with socio-political realities.
❓ この文章によると、人新世を地質時代として正式に定義することに対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A. それは、地球を形成し続ける自然現象を説明できていない。
B. B. それは、人間の影響が異なる集団の間で不均等に分布していることを無視している。
C. C. それは核降下物やプラスチックのような指標を重視しすぎている。
D. D. それは、その時代が20世紀半ばに始まったのはあまりにも最近すぎることを示唆している。
✅ 正确答案
B. It ignores the uneven distribution of human impacts across different populations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first