The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture and societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions were associated with slower progress. However, critics in the mid-20th century, including Carl Sauer, contended that this perspective oversimplified the complex interplay between humans and their surroundings. Sauer emphasized that human agency and cultural choices play a pivotal role in adapting to and modifying environments. Contemporary scholarship largely rejects strict determinism, favoring a nuanced view that acknowledges environmental influences without disregarding social, historical, and technological factors. This evolution reflects a broader shift in geography toward understanding human-environment interactions as dynamic and reciprocal.
❓ 현대 학자들이 엄격한 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 기후가 인간 사회에 영향을 미치지 않는다고 믿는다.
B. B. 그들은 인간의 주체성과 문화적 요인이 사회를 형성하는 데 있어 equally 중요하다고 주장한다.
C. C. 그들은 그 이론이 기술 발전에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다고 생각한다.
D. D. 그들은 그 이론이 과학적으로 검증하기에는 너무 어렵다고 생각한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that human agency and cultural factors are equally important in shaping societies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first