The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture and societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions were associated with slower progress. However, critics in the mid-20th century, including Carl Sauer, contended that this perspective oversimplified the complex interplay between humans and their surroundings. Sauer emphasized that human agency and cultural choices play a pivotal role in adapting to and modifying environments. Contemporary scholarship largely rejects strict determinism, favoring a nuanced view that acknowledges environmental influences without disregarding social, historical, and technological factors. This evolution reflects a broader shift in geography toward understanding human-environment interactions as dynamic and reciprocal.
❓ What is the main reason contemporary scholars reject strict environmental determinism?
A. A. They believe climate has no effect on human societies.
B. B. They argue that human agency and cultural factors are equally important in shaping societies.
C. C. They find the theory too focused on technological advancements.
D. D. They consider the theory too difficult to test scientifically.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that human agency and cultural factors are equally important in shaping societies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first