The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological theory, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. Unlike non-human populations, human societies can modify their environment through technology and trade, potentially raising their carrying capacity. However, such modifications often generate unforeseen consequences, such as resource depletion and pollution, which may undermine long-term sustainability. Recent studies suggest that while technological innovation can temporarily alleviate pressure on natural systems, it does not eliminate the fundamental limits imposed by finite planetary resources. This has led some scholars to argue for a 'social carrying capacity' that incorporates not only biophysical constraints but also cultural and economic factors influencing consumption patterns. Critics, however, contend that this concept is too vague to be empirically tested, and that focusing on limits may discourage necessary technological optimism. The debate reflects a broader tension between environmental determinism and human agency in sustainability discourse.
❓ 저자는 기술 혁신이 수용 능력과 관련하여 어떤 주요 주장을 하는가?
A. 그것은 지구의 인간 수용 능력을 영구적으로 증가시킨다.
B. 그것은 단지 일시적인 해결책을 제공할 뿐이며, 궁극적인 자원 제한을 제거하지는 않습니다.
C. 인간 사회가 생태적 한계를 초과하는 능력에는 아무런 영향을 미치지 않는다.
D. 장기적인 지속 가능성을 달성하는 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 방법입니다.
✅ 正确答案
It only provides a temporary solution and does not remove ultimate resource limits.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first