The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly over the past three decades, moving beyond a narrow focus on the disproportionate exposure of minority communities to pollution. Contemporary scholarship now emphasizes the distributive, procedural, and recognition-based dimensions of environmental inequality. Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of environmental benefits and burdens, while procedural justice demands inclusive decision-making processes. Recognition-based justice, however, addresses the systemic devaluation of certain social groups, which often underlies both unequal distribution and exclusion from policy discussions. Recent empirical studies suggest that procedural reforms alone, such as public comment periods, rarely rectify entrenched power imbalances unless accompanied by mechanisms that actively empower marginalized stakeholders. Consequently, scholars argue for a multi-scalar approach, linking local struggles to broader structural changes in governance and economic systems. This holistic perspective challenges simplistic solutions and underscores the need for interdisciplinary frameworks to tackle the root causes of environmental inequity.
❓ Согласно тексту, какое из следующих утверждений является ключевым ограничением реформ процедурной справедливости?
A. A) Они слишком много внимания уделяют правосудию, основанному на признании.
B. B) Они часто не учитывают лежащие в основе асимметрии власти.
C. C) Они в первую очередь озабочены справедливым распределением бремени.
D. D) Они пренебрегают важностью участия общественности.
✅ 正确答案
B) They often fail to address underlying power asymmetries.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first