The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly over the past three decades, moving beyond a narrow focus on the disproportionate exposure of minority communities to pollution. Contemporary scholarship now emphasizes the distributive, procedural, and recognition-based dimensions of environmental inequality. Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of environmental benefits and burdens, while procedural justice demands inclusive decision-making processes. Recognition-based justice, however, addresses the systemic devaluation of certain social groups, which often underlies both unequal distribution and exclusion from policy discussions. Recent empirical studies suggest that procedural reforms alone, such as public comment periods, rarely rectify entrenched power imbalances unless accompanied by mechanisms that actively empower marginalized stakeholders. Consequently, scholars argue for a multi-scalar approach, linking local struggles to broader structural changes in governance and economic systems. This holistic perspective challenges simplistic solutions and underscores the need for interdisciplinary frameworks to tackle the root causes of environmental inequity.
❓ 根据文章内容,以下哪项是程序正义改革的一个关键局限性?
A. 他们过于关注基于认可的正义。
B. B) 它们往往未能解决根本性的权力不对称问题。
C. C) 他们主要关注负担的公平分配。
D. D)他们忽视了公众参与的重要性。
✅ 正确答案
B) They often fail to address underlying power asymmetries.