The concept of 'environmental debt' has gained traction among economists as a framework for understanding the long-term costs of resource depletion. Unlike financial debt, which is quantifiable and subject to repayment schedules, environmental debt is often diffuse and intergenerational, meaning that those who benefit from resource extraction today may not bear the full consequences of ecosystem degradation. This asymmetry raises ethical questions about sustainability and justice. Some scholars argue that technological innovation can offset environmental debt by increasing efficiency and enabling substitution of scarce resources. However, critics contend that such optimism overlooks irreversible thresholds, such as biodiversity loss or climate tipping points, where damage becomes catastrophic and irreversible. Thus, while the metaphor of debt highlights accountability, it may oversimplify the complex, non-linear dynamics of ecological systems.
❓ 저자가 '환경 부채'에 대해 제시하는 핵심 주장은 무엇인가?
A. A. 이는 금융 부채와 유사한데, 둘 다 수치화할 수 있고 상환 가능하기 때문이다.
B. B. 그것은 주로 현재 세대의 희생을 대가로 미래 세대에게 혜택을 준다.
C. C. 그것은 확산적이고 세대 간의 성격으로 인해 윤리적 및 지속 가능성 문제를 수반한다.
D. D. 기술 혁신은 환경 부채를 제거하는 데 충분한 능력을 입증해 왔다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It involves ethical and sustainability concerns due to its diffuse and intergenerational nature.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first