The concept of 'slow tourism' has gained traction among scholars as a counterpoint to mass tourism. Unlike conventional travel, which prioritizes efficiency and the accumulation of sights, slow tourism emphasizes immersive experiences, longer stays, and meaningful engagement with local cultures and environments. Researchers argue that this approach can mitigate the negative impacts of overtourism, such as environmental degradation and cultural commodification. However, critics contend that slow tourism remains an elite practice, accessible primarily to those with flexible schedules and disposable income, thereby potentially reinforcing social inequalities. Furthermore, the environmental benefits are not always clear-cut, as longer stays may still involve significant carbon footprints from long-haul travel. Thus, while slow tourism offers a promising alternative, its viability as a sustainable model requires careful consideration of both its social and ecological implications.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика медленного туризма?
A. Это приводит к более быстрому ухудшению состояния окружающей среды, чем массовый туризм.
B. В основном оно доступно привилегированным группам, что может усугубить неравенство.
C. Это препятствует культурному обмену между туристами и местными жителями.
D. Это не позволяет сократить количество туристов в популярных направлениях.
✅ 正确答案
It is mainly available to privileged groups, which may worsen inequality.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first