The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to multicultural environments than others. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ specifically encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the intrinsic interest and confidence in adapting cross-culturally, and behavioral CQ is the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research indicates that high CQ correlates with better job performance in international assignments, yet it is not a fixed trait; targeted training and immersive experiences can enhance it. However, critics argue that CQ measures often rely on self-reporting, which may not accurately predict real-world effectiveness, suggesting a need for more objective assessment tools.
❓ 根据文章所述，当前文化智力（CQ）评估的一个关键局限性是什么？
A. A. 他们强调认知知识而非行为技能。
B. B. 他们依赖自我报告的措施，这些措施可能无法反映实际表现。
C. C. 在大多数组织中，它们的实施成本过高。
D. D. 他们只关注文化适应中的动机方面。
✅ 正确答案
B. They rely on self-reported measures that may not reflect actual performance.