The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though it remains formally unrecognized as a distinct epoch. Proponents argue that human activities, such as nuclear testing, plastic pollution, and climate change, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, warranting a new geological time unit. Critics, however, contend that these markers are not yet sufficiently global or synchronous to meet the strict criteria of the International Commission on Stratigraphy. Moreover, some scholars suggest that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and social strata. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between the need for scientific precision and the cultural resonance of a term that captures humanity's role as a planetary force. Ultimately, whether or not the Anthropocene becomes official, its discussion forces a re-evaluation of how humans relate to Earth's history.
❓ 본문에 따르면, '인류세'라는 용어에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 지질 시대(epoch)로 간주되기에는 충분한 과학적 증거에 기반하지 않았다.
B. B. 그것은 핵 실험이 환경을 변화시키는 데 있어서의 역할을 인정하지 못한다.
C. C. 이는 인간의 영향이 전 세계적으로 균일하다는 것을 시사하는데, 이는 정확하지 않다.
D. D. 그것은 이미 국제층서위원회에 의해 거부되었습니다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It suggests that human impact is uniform across the globe, which is inaccurate.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first