The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though it remains formally unrecognized as a distinct epoch. Proponents argue that human activities, such as nuclear testing, plastic pollution, and climate change, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, warranting a new geological time unit. Critics, however, contend that these markers are not yet sufficiently global or synchronous to meet the strict criteria of the International Commission on Stratigraphy. Moreover, some scholars suggest that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and social strata. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between the need for scientific precision and the cultural resonance of a term that captures humanity's role as a planetary force. Ultimately, whether or not the Anthropocene becomes official, its discussion forces a re-evaluation of how humans relate to Earth's history.
❓ 文章によると、「人新世」という用語に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A. 地質学的な時代区分と見なすには、十分な科学的証拠に基づいていない。
B. B. 核実験が環境を変える役割を果たしたことを認識していない。
C. C. それは人間の影響が地球全体で均一であることを示唆しているが、これは正確ではない。
D. D. それは既に国際層序委員会によって却下されている。
✅ 正确答案
C. It suggests that human impact is uniform across the globe, which is inaccurate.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first