The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. While the Holocene, which began approximately 11,700 years ago, has been characterized by relatively stable climatic conditions that facilitated the development of agriculture and complex societies, the Anthropocene is marked by significant alterations to the planet's biogeochemical cycles, including dramatic increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide, widespread deforestation, and the proliferation of synthetic materials such as plastics. Proponents argue that these changes are stratigraphically distinct, leaving a lasting signature in sedimentary layers, and thus warrant formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term is more culturally and politically loaded than scientifically precise, and that identifying a clear chronological boundary remains contentious, with proposed start dates ranging from the advent of nuclear testing in the 1940s to the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century. This debate highlights the complex interplay between scientific observation and human value judgments in defining our planetary era.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주된 이유는 다음 중 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향에 대한 지질학적 증거는 퇴적층에서 감지하기에는 너무 약하다.
B. B. 해당 개념은 보편적으로 합의된 출발점이 부족하며, 비과학적 요인의 영향을 받는다.
C. C. 홀로세는 이미 인간이 유발한 모든 환경 변화를 충분히 설명하고 있다.
D. D. '인류세'라는 용어는 너무 최근의 것이어서 지질학적 분류에서 고려되기에는 이르다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The concept lacks a universally agreed-upon starting point and is influenced by non-scientific factors.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first