The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term is more a cultural or political statement than a rigorous scientific classification, noting that geological epochs typically span millions of years and are identified by natural, not anthropogenic, phenomena. This debate highlights a broader tension between scientific nomenclature and societal urgency, as the label 'Anthropocene' carries profound implications for how humanity perceives its role in shaping planetary futures.
❓ 본문에서 설명된 '인류세'라는 용어에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 심각한 환경 변화를 초래했는지 여부
B. B) 인류세에 대한 증거가 새로운 지질 시대를 정의하기에 충분한지 여부
C. C) 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진이 생태계에 해로운지 여부
D. D) 지질 시대가 자연적 또는 인간 유발 표지에 기반해야 하는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether the evidence for the Anthropocene is sufficient to define a new geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first