The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term is more a cultural or political statement than a rigorous scientific classification, noting that geological epochs typically span millions of years and are identified by natural, not anthropogenic, phenomena. This debate highlights a broader tension between scientific nomenclature and societal urgency, as the label 'Anthropocene' carries profound implications for how humanity perceives its role in shaping planetary futures.
❓ この文章で述べられている「人新世」という用語に関する主な論争点は何ですか?
A. A) 人間の活動が重大な環境変化を引き起こしたかどうか
B. B) 人新世の証拠が新たな地質時代を定義するのに十分であるかどうか
C. C) プラスチック汚染や核降下物が生態系に有害であるかどうか
D. D) 地質時代は自然的な指標に基づくべきか、人為的な指標に基づくべきか
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether the evidence for the Anthropocene is sufficient to define a new geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first