The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition as a new geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, such as nuclear testing and plastic pollution, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, justifying a distinct epoch following the Holocene. However, critics contend that the Anthropocene lacks a clear and globally synchronous start date, a prerequisite for formal geological time units. They suggest that human impacts are diachronous, occurring at different times across the globe, which complicates the definition of a single boundary. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between geological rigor and the need to communicate planetary-scale human influence effectively.
❓ 비평가들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동은 지속적인 지질학적 흔적을 남기지 않았다.
B. B) 제안된 시작 날짜가 지역별로 전 세계적으로 일관되지 않습니다.
C. C) 이 개념은 핵 실험에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있으며 다른 영향들을 무시하고 있다.
D. D) 홀로세 시대는 경계가 명확하지 않을 만큼 너무 최근이다.
✅ 正确答案
B) The proposed start date is not globally consistent across regions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first