The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human influence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that human activity lacks a single, synchronous global boundary layer comparable to previous epoch transitions. This debate highlights a broader tension between scientific classification and societal narrative, as naming an epoch carries implications for how we perceive our responsibility toward the planet's future.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная причина, по которой критики отвергают антропоцен как формальную геологическую эпоху?
A. Воздействие человека недостаточно значительно, чтобы изменить геологические слои.
B. Не существует единого всемирного маркера, который соответствовал бы одной временной границе.
C. Термин является чисто политическим и не имеет научной основы.
D. Геологические эпохи не могут определяться изменениями, вызванными деятельностью человека.
✅ 正确答案
There is no consistent worldwide marker that aligns with a single time boundary.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first