The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human influence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that human activity lacks a single, synchronous global boundary layer comparable to previous epoch transitions. This debate highlights a broader tension between scientific classification and societal narrative, as naming an epoch carries implications for how we perceive our responsibility toward the planet's future.
❓ 根据文章所述,批评者拒绝将“人类世”作为正式地质纪元的主要原因是什么?
A. 人类活动的影响尚不足以改变地质地层。
B. 全球范围内没有一致的标记物能与单一时间界限相对应。
C. 这一术语纯粹是政治性的,缺乏科学依据。
D. 地质时代不能由人类引起的变化来定义。
✅ 正确答案
There is no consistent worldwide marker that aligns with a single time boundary.