The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding effectiveness in cross-cultural interactions. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar cultural context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct components: metacognitive CQ (the conscious awareness and regulation of cultural assumptions during interactions), cognitive CQ (knowledge of norms, practices, and conventions in different cultures), motivational CQ (the drive and interest to adapt to cultural differences), and behavioral CQ (the ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions in cross-cultural encounters). A growing body of empirical evidence suggests that high CQ predicts better job performance, smoother negotiations, and reduced culture shock among expatriates. However, critics argue that CQ measures often rely on self-report, which may be subject to social desirability bias, and that the construct overlaps significantly with general cognitive ability and openness to experience, questioning its incremental validity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 다음 중 문화적 지능(CQ)에 대한 주요 비판을 가장 잘 설명하는 것은 무엇인가?
A. A. CQ는 감성 지능과 너무 유사하여 새로운 정보를 거의 추가하지 않는다.
B. B. CQ 측정은 종종 자기 보고 방식으로 이루어지며, 해당 개념이 기존의 다른 확립된 특성들과 뚜렷이 구별되지 않을 수도 있다.
C. C. CQ는 인지적 측면에만 초점을 맞추고 행동적 수행을 무시한다.
D. D. CQ는 직무 성과나 해외 파견 적응과 같은 실질적 결과와 연결되지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B. CQ measures are often self-reported, and the concept may not be distinct from other established traits.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first