The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture, economic activities, and even societal development. Proponents argue that civilizations in temperate zones have historically advanced faster due to favorable agricultural conditions and moderate climates, which allowed for surplus food production and the emergence of complex social structures. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies the relationship between nature and society, ignoring the role of human innovation, technological adaptation, and historical contingencies. They point to examples like the flourishing of desert cities through advanced irrigation systems, which challenge the notion of climatic inevitability. Contemporary scholarship increasingly favors a more nuanced view, recognizing that while environmental factors are influential, they interact with a myriad of social, political, and economic variables, making any deterministic explanation inadequate.
❓ 비판자들이 본문에서 제시된 환경 결정론에 대해 제기하는 주요 논거는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 기후가 사회 발전의 유일한 결정 요인이라고 믿는다.
B. B. 그들은 인간의 창의성과 적응력이 환경적 제약을 극복할 수 있다고 주장한다.
C. C. 그들은 온대 지역이 본질적으로 발전에 더 유리하다는 생각을 지지한다.
D. D. 그들은 기술이 환경적 요인을 무의미하게 만들었다고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that human creativity and adaptability can overcome environmental constraints.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first