The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were marked by natural climatic shifts or mass extinctions, the Anthropocene is characterized by human-driven changes such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and accelerated carbon emissions. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious, as some scientists argue that the markers of human activity are not yet distinct enough to warrant a separate geological classification. Others contend that the term, while scientifically imprecise, serves a vital role in highlighting humanity's collective responsibility for planetary stewardship. This debate underscores the intersection of empirical science and societal discourse, raising questions about how we define and respond to our influence on the planet.
❓ 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향은 정확히 측정하기에는 너무 광범위하다.
B. B. 인간 활동의 흔적은 아직 별도의 분류를 정당화할 만큼 뚜렷하지 않다.
C. C. 그 용어는 너무 부정확하여 과학에서 실용적인 용도가 없다.
D. D. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염은 지질학적 지표로 간주되지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The markers of human activity are not yet distinct enough to justify a separate classification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first