The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While some scientists argue for its formal recognition as a new geological epoch, citing markers such as nuclear fallout and plastic pollution, others contend that the term blurs the line between geological time and historical narrative. This debate is not merely semantic; it raises fundamental questions about how we conceptualize human impact and responsibility. Proponents claim that formalizing the Anthropocene would spur policy changes by highlighting the scale of human alteration. Critics, however, warn that such a designation may oversimplify the complex, uneven nature of human-environment interactions, potentially masking the disproportionate contributions of industrialized nations. Ultimately, the discourse reflects a broader tension between scientific precision and the need for a compelling framework to address global environmental crises.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세를 공식화하는 것에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 핵심 우려는 무엇인가?
A. 이는 경제 성장을 저해하는 과도한 정책 변화를 초래할 것입니다.
B. 이는 환경 변화에 대한 각 국가의 불평등한 책임을 모호하게 만들 수 있다.
C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염 같은 지표에 너무 크게 의존하고 있다.
D. 환경 위기를 해결하기 위한 설득력 있는 서사를 제공하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
It may obscure the unequal responsibilities of different countries for environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first