The concept of 'digital twins' has gained traction in urban planning, referring to virtual replicas of physical cities that simulate real-time data to optimize infrastructure. However, critics argue that reliance on such models may exacerbate inequality, as data collection often prioritizes affluent districts, leaving marginalized communities underrepresented. A study by Chen et al. (2023) found that predictive algorithms in digital twins tend to reinforce existing spatial biases unless explicitly calibrated with socio-economic variables. Proponents counter that these tools enable proactive maintenance, reducing costs and environmental impact. Yet, the ethical dilemma persists: who decides which data are relevant, and how can transparency be ensured when proprietary systems govern public spaces? Ultimately, the success of digital twins hinges not on technological sophistication but on inclusive governance frameworks that mandate equitable data representation and community oversight.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 도시 계획에서 디지털 트윈 사용에 관한 주요 우려 사항은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것들은 대부분의 도시가 시행하기에는 너무 비싸다.
B. B) 그들은 편향된 데이터 수집을 통해 기존의 사회적 불평등을 강화할 수 있다.
C. C) 그들은 실시간 교통 패턴을 정확하게 시뮬레이션할 수 없습니다.
D. D) 그들은 기능하기 위해 과도한 정부 규제를 요구한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) They may reinforce existing social inequalities through biased data collection.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first