The concept of 'digital twins' has gained traction in urban planning, referring to virtual replicas of physical cities that simulate real-time data to optimize infrastructure. However, critics argue that reliance on such models may exacerbate inequality, as data collection often prioritizes affluent districts, leaving marginalized communities underrepresented. A study by Chen et al. (2023) found that predictive algorithms in digital twins tend to reinforce existing spatial biases unless explicitly calibrated with socio-economic variables. Proponents counter that these tools enable proactive maintenance, reducing costs and environmental impact. Yet, the ethical dilemma persists: who decides which data are relevant, and how can transparency be ensured when proprietary systems govern public spaces? Ultimately, the success of digital twins hinges not on technological sophistication but on inclusive governance frameworks that mandate equitable data representation and community oversight.
❓ 根据文章内容,关于数字孪生在城市规划中的应用,一个主要的担忧是什么?
A. A) 对大多数城市而言,它们过于昂贵,难以实施。
B. B) 它们可能通过有偏见的数据收集来加剧现有的社会不平等。
C. C)它们无法准确模拟实时交通模式。
D. D)它们需要过度的政府监管才能运作。
✅ 正确答案
B) They may reinforce existing social inequalities through biased data collection.