The concept of 'environmental refugee' has gained traction in recent decades, yet its legal definition remains contentious. Unlike traditional refugees who flee persecution, environmental migrants are displaced by gradual ecological degradation or sudden natural disasters. Scholars argue that the term 'refugee' implies a legal status under international law, which currently does not recognize environmental factors as grounds for asylum. This ambiguity creates a protection gap, leaving affected populations without formal rights or international assistance. Some propose extending the 1951 Refugee Convention, while others advocate for a separate legal framework to address climate-induced displacement. The debate underscores the tension between state sovereignty and humanitarian obligations, as nations grapple with resource constraints and border security. Ultimately, the lack of consensus hinders effective policy responses to one of the most pressing challenges of the Anthropocene.
❓ 「環境難民」という用語が問題視される主な理由は何ですか？
A. A. 環境移民は実際には故郷を逃れていない。
B. B. 「難民」の既存の法的定義は、環境による避難を対象としていない。
C. C. 自然災害は、避難を引き起こすほど深刻ではない。
D. D. 各国は、いかなる移民に対しても人道的援助を提供することに消極的である。
✅ 正确答案
B. The existing legal definition of 'refugee' does not cover environmental displacement.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first