The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were demarcated by natural phenomena such as glacial shifts or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers including plastic pollution, nuclear fallout residues, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, its formal recognition remains contentious. Some scholars argue that the term oversimplifies the complex and uneven responsibilities of different societies, while others contend that it distracts from the need for targeted policy interventions by implying a universal human agency. Proponents, conversely, maintain that the epoch serves as a powerful heuristic device, compelling humanity to acknowledge its collective role in shaping planetary futures and fostering a sense of urgency in environmental discourse.
❓ Какова ключевая причина, по которой некоторые учёные выступают против официального признания антропоцена?
A. Ему не хватает достаточных геологических доказательств для новой эпохи.
B. Это несправедливо приписывает экологический ущерб всем человеческим обществам в равной степени.
C. Он слишком сильно сосредоточен на политических вмешательствах, а не на научных исследованиях.
D. Он не включает природные маркеры, такие как сдвиги ледников.
✅ 正确答案
It unfairly attributes environmental damage to all human societies equally.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first