The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were defined by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic markers such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that these markers are distinct and persistent enough to warrant a formal boundary in the geological time scale. However, critics contend that the term overstates humanity's influence relative to natural processes, which have historically driven planetary change over millions of years. They also question whether the human footprint is globally synchronous, as geological epochs require a clear, worldwide starting point. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the broader narrative of human agency in shaping the planet.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식적으로 정의하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유 중 하나는 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동의 흔적은 자연적 과정과 충분히 구별되지 않는다.
B. 인류가 지구에 미치는 영향은 측정하기에는 너무 최근의 일이다.
C. 제안된 마커들은 전 세계적으로 동시에 나타나지 않을 수 있습니다.
D. '인류세'라는 용어는 과학적 사용에 너무 정치적으로 부담되는 용어입니다.
✅ 正确答案
The proposed markers may not appear simultaneously across the globe.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first