The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and terrain, directly shapes human societies and their cultural development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions, with their harsh conditions, hindered progress. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its oversimplification and potential to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies. Modern scholarship, such as that by Jared Diamond in 'Guns, Germs, and Steel,' acknowledges environmental influences but emphasizes the role of historical contingencies, technological innovation, and social structures. Thus, while the environment can set constraints, it does not dictate outcomes; human agency and cultural exchange play equally crucial roles in shaping societal trajectories.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 초기 환경결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 발달에 있어 기후의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 그것은 환경의 영향을 지나치게 강조하며 비윤리적인 관행을 정당화할 수 있다.
C. C. 기술 혁신에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
D. D. 그것은 역사적 우연성의 중요성을 인정하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It overemphasizes the influence of the environment and may justify unethical practices.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first