The concept of 'ecosystem services' has gained prominence in environmental policy, yet its economic valuation remains contentious. Proponents argue that assigning monetary values to services like pollination or water purification incentivizes conservation by making their loss visible in cost-benefit analyses. Critics, however, contend that such valuation is inherently reductive, as it overlooks non-material cultural and spiritual values that resist quantification. Moreover, market-based mechanisms, such as carbon trading, may commodify nature, potentially leading to 'green grabbing' where powerful actors exploit these frameworks for profit. Despite these debates, a pragmatic middle ground suggests using valuation as a communicative tool rather than a definitive metric, encouraging dialogue between scientists, policymakers, and local communities to foster more holistic stewardship of natural resources.
❓ 생태계 서비스의 경제적 가치 평가에 관한 저자의 주요 주장은 무엇인가?
A. A) 이는 비효율적인 접근 방식으로, 엄격한 규제를 선호하는 방향으로 폐기되어야 한다.
B. B) 이는 절대적인 기준이 아닌, 더 넓은 논의를 촉진하기 위한 수단으로 신중하게 사용되어야 한다.
C. C) 그것은 보편적으로 유익하며 모든 환경 정책의 일차적 근거가 되어야 한다.
D. D) 이는 문화 서비스에만 관련이 있으며, 이는 정량화할 수 없습니다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It should be used cautiously as a means to facilitate broader discussion, not as an absolute measure.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first