托福综合写作

📖 阅读文章

The extinction of the woolly mammoth has long been attributed to overhunting by early humans, a theory known as the 'Pleistocene overkill' hypothesis. Proponents argue that human arrival in North America around 13,000 years ago coincided with a rapid decline in mammoth populations. First, archaeological evidence shows that Clovis spear points, characteristic of early human hunters, are frequently found alongside mammoth remains, suggesting direct predation. Second, the timing of human migration aligns closely with the last known appearance of mammoths on the continent, implying a cause-and-effect relationship. Third, modern studies of island ecosystems, such as Wrangel Island, demonstrate that small mammoth populations persisted long after the main continental extinction, but only until humans arrived there as well, further supporting the idea that human hunting was the decisive factor.

🎧 听力讲座

The reading's overkill hypothesis is compelling, but it fails to account for several critical factors. First, while Clovis points are found with mammoth bones, the number of such kill sites is remarkably small—fewer than 15 across North America. If humans were the primary cause, we would expect far more evidence of mass hunting. Second, the timing argument is flawed: recent DNA analysis of mammoth populations shows a genetic bottleneck beginning around 20,000 years ago, long before humans arrived, indicating that environmental stress was already driving them to decline. Third, the Wrangel Island example actually undermines the hunting theory. Mammoths survived there for over 7,000 years after their mainland extinction, and when humans finally arrived, the mammoths had already vanished due to rapid climate change that shrank their habitat. In fact, the island's mammoths disappeared before any human contact, as evidenced by sediment cores showing no human presence at that time. Therefore, climate change, not human hunting, was the primary driver of mammoth extinction.