TOEFL 통합 작문

📖 읽기 지문

The extinction of large terrestrial mammals, such as woolly mammoths and saber-toothed cats, at the end of the Pleistocene epoch has long puzzled scientists. While climate change and human hunting are often cited, a less considered factor is the impact of a comet or asteroid impact. This theory, known as the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, posits that a cosmic impact around 12,900 years ago triggered a rapid cooling event and widespread environmental disruption, leading to the demise of megafauna. Three lines of evidence support this hypothesis. First, a distinct sedimentary layer dating to this period contains high concentrations of iridium, a rare element in Earth's crust but common in asteroids and comets. Second, microscopic spherules and nanodiamonds—materials formed under extreme heat and pressure—have been found in this same layer, suggesting a high-energy impact event. Third, the timing of the megafaunal extinctions in North America coincides remarkably with the proposed impact date, with fossil records showing a sudden disappearance of many large species around 12,900 years ago. Thus, the cosmic impact theory offers a compelling explanation for the abrupt and selective extinction of these animals.

🎧 듣기 강의

The theory presented in the reading is intriguing, but it fails to hold up under scrutiny. Let me explain why. First, the iridium layer cited as evidence is not unique. Iridium anomalies have been found in many geological layers that are not associated with any known impact, and they can also result from volcanic eruptions or other terrestrial processes. The iridium concentration in the Younger Dryas layer is actually much lower than that found at the dinosaur-killing Chicxulub impact, and it lacks the characteristic isotopic signature of extraterrestrial material. Second, the so-called 'impact markers' such as spherules and nanodiamonds are highly controversial. Many geologists have re-examined these samples and found that they are not impact-related. For instance, the spherules are often misidentified volcanic ash or cosmic dust, and the nanodiamonds have been shown to be of terrestrial origin, possibly formed by forest fires or other non-impact processes. Third, the timing argument is flawed. While megafaunal extinctions do occur around 12,900 years ago in some regions, the extinction was not simultaneous globally. In fact, many large mammals disappeared thousands of years earlier or later in different parts of the world, suggesting a more gradual and regionally variable process. Moreover, the rapid cooling event known as the Younger Dryas is better explained by changes in ocean circulation and glacial meltwater, not an impact. Therefore, the evidence for a cosmic impact is weak and does not adequately explain the megafaunal extinctions.