As artificial intelligence technology advances rapidly, many countries have begun deploying algorithms in public decision-making, such as criminal sentencing, loan approvals, or recruitment screening. However, when algorithms err or are trained on biased data, the consequences are often far harder to trace and rectify than human decisions. Given this reality, should legislation prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions in areas involving citizens' fundamental rights? Or is it sufficient to retain a final human veto, trusting that the efficiency and objectivity of algorithms prove their benefits outweigh the harms? Please clarify your stance, provide reasons, and support your view with concrete examples.
雅思写作 Task 2 评分标准
任务回应(Task Response):是否完整回应题目要求,观点是否清晰,论证是否充分
连贯与衔接(Coherence and Cohesion):段落组织是否合理,逻辑是否清晰,连接词是否恰当
词汇资源(Lexical Resource):词汇是否丰富、准确,搭配是否地道
语法范围与准确性(Grammatical Range and Accuracy):句式是否多样,语法是否正确