Faced with the urgent reality of continuously rising global temperatures, some countries advocate prioritizing economic resources toward developing carbon capture and geological storage technologies rather than transitioning to renewable energy, arguing that the former can more directly eliminate existing emissions. However, environmentalists and climate scientists insist that such technologies are costly and of questionable effectiveness, far less capable of fundamentally reducing emissions than investing in mature clean energy sources like solar and wind power. In your view, to address climate change, should funding and policy lean more toward which side? Please elaborate on your stance and provide examples to support your argument.
雅思写作 Task 2 评分标准
任务回应(Task Response):是否完整回应题目要求,观点是否清晰,论证是否充分
连贯与衔接(Coherence and Cohesion):段落组织是否合理,逻辑是否清晰,连接词是否恰当
词汇资源(Lexical Resource):词汇是否丰富、准确,搭配是否地道
语法范围与准确性(Grammatical Range and Accuracy):句式是否多样,语法是否正确