The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained significant traction in environmental policy discussions over the past two decades. Defined as the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to sustain a population's consumption and waste absorption, this metric provides a tangible measure of human demand on nature. However, critics argue that the footprint fails to account for technological innovations that can enhance resource efficiency, thereby potentially overestimating the environmental impact of developed nations. Conversely, proponents contend that the metric serves as a crucial warning mechanism, highlighting unsustainable consumption patterns that exceed planetary boundaries. Recent studies suggest that integrating the footprint with other socio-economic indicators, such as income inequality and energy intensity, could yield a more nuanced understanding of sustainability challenges, especially in rapidly industrializing regions.
❓ この文章で言及されている生態学的フットプリント指標に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. 技術の進歩が資源利用に与える影響を考慮していない。
B. それは発展途上国の環境への影響を過大評価している。
C. それは、持続可能性における所得格差の役割を無視している。
D. それは、人間の自然に対する需要を具体的に測定する手段を提供していない。
✅ 正确答案
It does not consider the effects of technological advancements on resource use.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first