The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained traction in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ entails the ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions. Research suggests that high CQ predicts better job performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or conflict resolution. However, critics argue that CQ may overlap excessively with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its unique predictive validity beyond established constructs.
❓ 根据文章内容,以下哪项最能描述批评者对文化智能提出的主要担忧?
A. A) 与情商相比,它缺乏一个清晰的定义。
B. B) 它可能无法提供超越现有心理测量手段的预测能力。
C. C) 它过于侧重行为层面,而忽视了认知。
D. D) 它仅适用于谈判和冲突解决的情境中。
✅ 正确答案
B) It may not offer predictive power beyond existing psychological measures.