The concept of 'digital twins' has garnered significant attention in urban planning, referring to virtual replicas of physical cities that integrate real-time data from sensors, infrastructure, and citizen behavior. These dynamic models allow planners to simulate scenarios such as traffic congestion, energy consumption, or flood responses before implementing costly changes in the real world. However, critics argue that reliance on digital twins may exacerbate existing inequalities, as data collection often prioritizes affluent areas with better sensor coverage, while marginalized communities remain underrepresented. Furthermore, the predictive accuracy of these models hinges on the quality and bias of the underlying algorithms, which can perpetuate flawed assumptions. Proponents counter that with transparent governance and inclusive data strategies, digital twins could democratize planning by enabling community feedback and iterative testing. Ultimately, the efficacy of such tools depends not merely on technological sophistication but on the ethical frameworks guiding their deployment.
❓ 批评者对于数字孪生技术在城市规划中的应用所提出的主要担忧是什么?
A. A. 对大多数市政当局而言,它们过于昂贵,难以有效实施。
B. B. 由于数据收集不均和算法偏见,它们可能加剧社会差距。
C. C. 他们无法准确预测洪水或地震等自然灾害。
D. D. 它们减少了对物理基础设施和人工决策的需求。
✅ 正确答案
B. They may reinforce social disparities due to uneven data collection and algorithmic bias.