The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were demarcated by natural phenomena such as glacial cycles or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers like nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence, suggesting that a single global epoch cannot capture the disparate environmental changes across regions and time periods. Proponents counter that the Anthropocene highlights the unprecedented scale and speed of human-driven transformation, urging interdisciplinary cooperation to address planetary challenges. This debate underscores a deeper tension in science: balancing precise classification with broader societal relevance.
❓ 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 활동이 지역별로 불균등하고 다양한 영향을 미친다는 점을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B. 이는 인간이 유발한 환경 변화에 대한 충분한 증거를 제공하지 않는다.
C. C. 이는 과학적 정밀성보다 사회적 관련성을 우선시하여 객관성을 훼손한다.
D. D. 그것은 빙하기 주기와 같은 자연적 사건에 지나치게 초점을 맞추어 인간적 요인을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
A. It fails to account for the uneven and varied impacts of human activity across different areas.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first