The concept of 'environmental determinism', which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been a subject of intense debate among geographers. While early proponents like Ellsworth Huntington argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, critics contend that such theories oversimplify complex human-environment interactions and often carry ethnocentric biases. Modern scholarship, however, acknowledges that environmental factors can exert significant constraints on agricultural productivity, resource availability, and settlement patterns, but emphasizes that human innovation, cultural values, and political systems mediate these influences. Consequently, the current consensus leans toward 'possibilism', which suggests that the environment offers a set of possibilities from which societies choose based on their cultural and technological capabilities. This nuanced perspective avoids the pitfalls of determinism while still recognizing the importance of physical geography in shaping human history.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 초기 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 농업에서 기후의 역할을 무시했다.
B. 그것은 지나치게 단순화되었고 민족중심적이었다.
C. 온대 지역에만 초점을 맞추었다.
D. 그것은 지리학이 사회에 미치는 영향을 거부했다.
✅ 正确答案
It was overly simplistic and ethnocentric.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first