The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike previous epochs, which are identified by natural stratigraphic markers, the Anthropocene is characterized by anthropogenic signatures such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human influence is not uniform temporally or spatially, making it difficult to establish a clear chronological boundary. Proponents counter that the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration' offers a distinct marker, as post-1950 deposits exhibit unprecedented and synchronous changes across multiple proxies. This debate underscores a fundamental tension in geology: whether to prioritize a narrative of human intervention or adhere strictly to naturalistic criteria for stratigraphic classification.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세의 공식적 인정을 둘러싼 논란의 주요 원인은 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 영향은 지질층에서 관찰되지 않는다.
B. B) 인간의 영향에 대해 명확한 시간적 경계가 존재하는지에 대해서는 의견이 분분하다.
C. C) 대부분의 지질학자들은 인간이 주도하는 환경 변화라는 생각을 거부한다.
D. D) 제안된 시기는 층서학적 지표를 전혀 포함하지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B) There is disagreement over whether a clear temporal boundary exists for human effects.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first