The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a contentious issue in geography. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that climate and topography directly shaped human behavior and societal development. However, this perspective was heavily criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural interactions and for justifying colonial narratives. Modern scholars advocate for 'possibilism', which posits that the environment offers a range of possibilities, but human agency, technology, and cultural choices ultimately determine outcomes. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences toward recognizing the interplay between natural constraints and human innovation. While environmental factors undeniably influence agricultural yields or settlement patterns, they do not dictate the sophistication of a civilization. Instead, adaptive strategies and historical contingencies often prove more decisive in explaining why societies thrive or decline.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 사회 발전에서 기술의 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. B. 그것은 기후가 인간 활동에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
C. C. 그것은 복잡한 문화적 상호작용을 단순화하고 식민주의 서사를 지지했다.
D. D. 그것은 환경이 인간 행동에 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 생각을 거부한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It simplifies complex cultural interactions and supported colonial narratives.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first