The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike earlier epochs, which were delineated by natural events such as ice ages or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers like radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human activity has not yet produced a sufficiently distinct and permanent stratigraphic signature to justify a new epoch, whereas proponents emphasize the unprecedented scale and speed of environmental change. This debate reflects broader questions about how science categorizes time and the role of human agency in shaping planetary history.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세에 대한 논쟁의 주요 원인은 무엇인가?
A. A. 제안된 시기는 인간의 영향에 대한 명확한 지표가 부족하다.
B. B. 일부 과학자들은 인간의 영향이 충분히 독특하고 지속적인지 의문을 제기한다.
C. C. 인류세는 빙하기와 같은 자연적 사건에만 기반을 두고 있다.
D. D. 지질 기록에는 핵 실험이나 플라스틱 오염의 증거가 없다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Some scientists question whether human effects are distinctive and lasting enough.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first