The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geographical studies. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and terrain, fundamentally shapes human culture, economic activities, and societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as less conducive to technological progress. However, modern scholars largely reject this deterministic view, emphasizing instead the role of human agency and technological innovation in overcoming environmental constraints. They point to examples like the Netherlands, where extensive land reclamation projects have transformed previously inhospitable marshes into productive agricultural land, demonstrating that humans can significantly modify their environment. Moreover, critics argue that environmental determinism often serves to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies. Thus, contemporary geography favors a more nuanced approach, recognizing the bidirectional relationship between humans and their environment, where environmental factors influence but do not dictate societal outcomes.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론에 대해 제기하는 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 사회를 형성하는 데 있어 기술의 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. B) 이는 인간의 환경 적응 및 수정 가능성을 무시한다.
C. C) 열대 지역과 그 발전에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
D. D) 온대 기후가 문명에 더 우월하다고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It ignores the potential for human adaptation and modification of the environment.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first