The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes, and to absorb the waste it generates, given prevailing technology and resource management. This metric highlights disparities in resource consumption: for instance, if all people lived like the average American, we would need over five planets to sustain current global consumption levels. However, critics argue that the footprint fails to account for technological innovations that can increase resource efficiency or for the substitution of resources, potentially overstating long-term unsustainability. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a powerful tool for raising awareness about overconsumption and for prompting policy discussions on sustainable development.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 생태발자국의 주요 비판점은 무엇인가?
A. A) 인간 활동으로 발생하는 폐기물의 흡수를 고려하지 않는다.
B. B) 이는 기술 발전과 자원 대체가 환경 영향을 줄일 수 있는 잠재력을 무시한다.
C. C) 그것은 지구상에 이용 가능한 생물학적 생산성이 있는 토지의 양을 과대평가한다.
D. D) 여러 국가 간의 자원 소비를 비교하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It ignores the potential of technological advances and resource substitution to reduce environmental impact.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first