The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human behavior, cultural development, and societal structures. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions, with their perceived abundance and monotony, hindered progress. However, this view has been largely discredited in modern academia for its oversimplification and inherent biases. Critics point to the rise of advanced societies in diverse climates, from the Incan empire in the Andes to the Khmer civilization in Southeast Asia, as evidence that human ingenuity and adaptability often transcend environmental constraints. Contemporary research instead emphasizes a more nuanced interplay, where environment offers possibilities and limitations, but human agency, technology, and historical context play decisive roles in shaping outcomes.
❓ 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 열대 지역에만 적용 가능했다.
B. B) 그것은 인간의 혁신적 역할을 무시했고, 다양한 기후 속의 문명들을 간과했다.
C. C) 그것은 진보의 척도로서 오로지 기술적 발전에만 의존했다.
D. D) 그것은 19세기의 낡은 기후 데이터에 기반한 것이었다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It ignored the role of human innovation and overlooked civilizations in varied climates.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first