The concept of 'ecological footprint' has become a central tool in sustainability science, measuring the demand humans place on natural resources. It quantifies the amount of biologically productive land and water required to produce the goods consumed and to absorb the waste generated, given prevailing technology. Recent studies indicate that the global footprint now exceeds Earth's biocapacity by approximately 75%, a condition termed 'overshoot'. This overshoot implies that we are depleting natural capital rather than living off its interest, leading to long-term environmental degradation. However, critics argue that the metric oversimplifies complex regional disparities, as it aggregates data across nations, masking the fact that high-income countries often have footprints far exceeding their own biocapacity, while low-income nations may remain below sustainable thresholds. Thus, while the ecological footprint provides a compelling wake-up call, its utility for targeted policy interventions remains debated.
❓ Según el pasaje, ¿cuál es una limitación importante de la huella ecológica como herramienta de política?
A. No tiene en cuenta los avances tecnológicos en el uso de los recursos.
B. No refleja la distribución desigual del consumo de recursos entre los países ricos y pobres.
C. Sobreestima la biocapacidad de las naciones de altos ingresos.
D. Ignora el papel de la absorción de residuos en la sostenibilidad.
✅ 正确答案
It does not reflect the uneven distribution of resource consumption between rich and poor countries.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first