The concept of 'environmental migration' has gained significant attention in recent decades, yet its definition remains contested. While some scholars argue that environmental factors alone rarely drive migration, others contend that gradual environmental degradation, such as desertification or sea-level rise, can act as a 'threat multiplier' that exacerbates existing socio-economic vulnerabilities. A 2018 study by the World Bank projected that by 2050, over 140 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America could be forced to move within their own countries due to climate-related impacts on agriculture and water availability. However, critics caution that such projections often rely on deterministic models that overlook human agency and adaptive capacity. They emphasize that migration is a complex, multi-causal phenomenon, where environmental stressors interact with political instability, economic inequality, and demographic pressures. Consequently, policy responses must move beyond simplistic labels like 'climate refugee' and instead adopt integrated strategies that address root causes, including sustainable development and conflict resolution.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 세계은행의 2018년 연구와 같은 전망에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그들은 이주에 있어 인간의 의사결정 역할을 과대평가한다.
B. 그들은 환경적 요인이 이주의 유일한 동인이라는 점을 고려하지 못한다.
C. 그들은 사람들의 적응 능력을 고려하지 않을 수 있는 모델에 의존한다.
D. 그들은 해수면 상승이 해안 지역 주민들에게 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
They rely on models that may not account for people's ability to adapt.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first