The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were shaped by natural forces over millions of years, the Anthropocene is characterized by rapid, human-induced changes, including climate alteration, biodiversity loss, and the proliferation of synthetic materials. However, the formal recognition of this epoch is contentious. Critics argue that human impacts vary greatly across time and space, making it difficult to establish a clear global boundary marker, such as a specific rock layer or chemical signature. Proponents counter that markers like radioactive isotopes from mid-20th-century nuclear tests offer a synchronous and unambiguous signal. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between the need for precise scientific criteria and the acknowledgment of humanity's pervasive and uneven footprint.
❓ What is the main reason for disagreement over officially recognizing the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch?
A. A. Scientists cannot agree on whether human impacts are significant enough to alter geological formations.
B. B. The proposed epoch lacks a consistent and globally identifiable marker due to the uneven nature of human influence.
C. C. Radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests are not considered a reliable indicator by any geologists.
D. D. Natural forces have continued to shape Earth's geology more than human activities in recent decades.
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed epoch lacks a consistent and globally identifiable marker due to the uneven nature of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first