The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were shaped by natural forces such as volcanic activity or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is marked by human-driven changes, including nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and rapid biodiversity loss. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Some scientists argue that the markers of human activity are too variable and not yet globally synchronized to justify a distinct geological boundary. Others contend that the Anthropocene, if officially adopted, could serve as a powerful reminder of humanity's collective responsibility, prompting more urgent environmental policy. This debate highlights the intersection of scientific classification and societal implications, underscoring that naming an epoch is not merely a technical exercise but also a cultural and political act.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간 활동은 심각한 환경 변화를 초래하지 않았다.
B. B. 인간 영향의 지표는 충분히 균일하지 않거나 전 지구적으로 동기화되어 있지 않다.
C. C. 인류세(Anthropocene) 개념은 정치적 또는 문화적 관련성이 없다.
D. D. 화산 활동과 같은 자연적 힘은 여전히 지구의 지질학에 지배적인 영향을 미치고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The markers of human impact are not sufficiently uniform or globally synchronized.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first